图1:成分和慢性淋巴细胞白血病亚型在集群数据的关系。分析,识别示意图表示的慢性淋巴细胞白血病亚型CLL8,达到队列和确认。四大集群(GI,(我)胃肠道,EMT-L,(我)EMT-L),和协会的NRIP1炎症或三(12)EBF1-r签名也独立验证队列中标识的审判。Co-clustering GI / (I)的胃肠道和EMT-L / (I) EMT-L病例达到队列支持治疗期间subgroup-specific特征的选择。b的热图显示共识集群k = 6用于定义慢性淋巴细胞白血病亚型(n = 337)。基因的分布特点如下所示的热图。重要变量浓缩在集群观察德尔(17页)(p = 0.05), TP53突变(p = 0.01),三(12)(p = 7 e−06),德尔(13)(p = 0.03),和IGHV突变状态(p = 0.008)(所有确切概率法(双边))。TP53移码突变发生只在胃肠道和剪切位点突变EBF1-r病例。三(12)强烈在资料库EBF1-r (72.7%)。c端粒长度在慢性淋巴细胞白血病亚型明显不同(p < 0.001,克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验),和最短长度是在胃肠道中位数为3.8 kb (p = 0.003, Mann-Whitney(双面),对胃肠道和(我)EMT-L) (n = 333)。 d White blood cell counts are significantly different across CLL subtypes (p < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test), show decreased counts in inflammatory CLL and are lowest in (I)EMT-L with median 61.1 G/L (p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney (two-sided), for GI vs. (I)EMT-L) (n = 330). For Fig. 1a–d, data within individual figures derives from biologically independent samples. For the boxplots, centerline, box limits, and whiskers represent the median, 25th, and 75th percentiles, and 1.5× interquartile range, respectively. Credit: DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25403-y